|
C.F.W. CONCERN FOR FAMILY AND WOMANHOOD |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The CFW is
a British based organisation and charitable trust (Reg. No. 291323), the main
objects of which are to advance education in, to preserve, to promulgate, and
to promote, the proper man-woman relationship, masculinity and femininity,
the different sex roles, marriage, and the family unit, in accordance with
the Holy Bible and the marriage service in the Book of Common Prayer. The CFW
seeks to show the considerable physical and psychological differences of the
sexes, the need to treat men and women (and boys and girls) differently, and
the great importance, value and validity of the different sex roles: the
submissive feminine woman, the natural feminine role of wife and mother in
the home, and the responsible, protective dominant masculine man. The
male-female polarities are an essential part of the individual's ego, and
form the basis of love, romance, happiness, the good family, and the good
society. Indeed, the very deep-rooted human sex differences are natural and,
for the Christian, are of God's creation and purpose. Consequently, the CFW
wants to see an end to Women's Lib./Feminist/Unisex legislation, education,
propaganda, practices and attitudes, which pervert and undermine the above.
In contrast, the CFW wants to see the sex differences fully recognised and
enhanced, not ignored, discredited, and perverted. The CFW is
not connected to any particular Christian denomination or to any other
organisation, but it is supported by men and women (in equal numbers) from
all walks of life and of all ages. It therefore invites your support. FORMATION ORGANISATION & SERVICE The CFW -
Concern for Family & Womanhood (additionally named Campaign for the
Feminine Woman) - was founded by David W. Stayt in
February 1985, and it follows on from an earlier organisation (solely known
as Campaign for the Feminine Woman) which he founded in November 1978
following massive support received in response to the BBC's transmission of a
television programme he wrote and produced entitled "In praise of
femininity and the feminine woman". The CFW trust is governed by
trustees, and by an elected General Council responsible to it. The purposes
of the CFW are furthered in many ways, including the production of various
publications and leaflets, the provision of lecturers and speakers (including
for TV and radio), and in providing centres for giving advice, practical
help, and a counselling service for the public. The CFW relies entirely upon
voluntary subscriptions, gifts, and help, for carrying out its urgent task. FEMINISM - A CANCER & PERVERSION The CFW
regards the so-called Women's Lib. (or Feminist) movement as a dangerous
cancer and perversion in human society which must be eradicated. It not only
runs contrary to human nature as seen over a vast period of time, and
contrary to modern anatomical, psychological, and other scientific knowledge and
evidence, but also contrary to the Holy Bible. Furthermore, its effects have
been catastrophic in terms of the havoc and unhappiness it has caused. The
Women's Libbers, who consist of both men and women, want to ignore the
natural sex differences, and to destroy the natural sex roles and the family,
regardless of the fact that these things are the source of most human love
and happiness. They want to change human society into a unisex organisation
where men and women are interchangeable, and they hope to achieve this by
legislation and by propaganda in education and the mass media - propaganda
which, as with political propaganda in some countries, now goes almost
unnoticed due to its continuous and subtle presentation. Anatomically
and psychologically, the sexes are specifically designed for their different,
but equally important, roles. The female role is essentially a submissive one
and the male role is essentially assertive and aggressive. This relationship
is an essential part of the love-making act and is reflected in many spheres
of activity. The sexes are complementary, not competitive, and the fact that
the man is naturally the dominant one does not make the other an inferior human
being as Women's Lib. would have it. The submissive female role is one of
creative fulfilment and joy, and is a beautiful human quality not to be
denigrated. Praise, encouragement, and support should be given to the
submissive feminine woman, and to the dominant protective responsible
masculine man. It is
because the natural and different sex roles are being ignored or perverted
that there is so much unhappiness and strife between the sexes, and so much
marital breakdown and divorce, instead of romance, chivalry, harmony and
love. (In FACTS ABOUT THE SEX DIFFERENCES Men and
women are different in size, shape, bone structure, tissue and appearance. A
man is much more muscular and is stronger than a woman: he can carry, for
instance, about three times as much weight. Voice, skin, hair, and metabolism
are different too. Women are naturally less aggressive and are more ruled by
their emotions: hence women cry and frighten more easily. Men have a stronger
sex drive and it is of a somewhat different character to that of a woman.
There are very extensive physical, psychological, emotional, genetic and
glandular differences between men and women, quite apart from the noticeably
different sex organs, their use, and the fact that women produce babies and
men do not. Of the
billions of cells that make up the body (including the brain) every cell in
the male is different from every cell in the female in a very special way:
the nucleus of every male cell carries a Y-chromosome which is absent in
every female cell. Glands and hormone production are also different (e.g.
testosterone in the male, and oestrogen and progesterone in the female) and
these have a profound effect on the whole body and mind, and create masculine
characteristics in men and feminine characteristics in women. Men have larger
brains (on average) which, together with other differences, give them greater
intellectual power or greater potentiality for the development of it. Women
have other mental attributes which are equally valuable. It is
because of all these and other differences that women are feminine and submissive,
and that men are masculine and dominant; that women
are wives, mothers, and home-makers, and that men are the leaders and
fighters; and that these differences in creation cause each sex to attract
and complement the other. One thing is very certain: masculinity and
femininity are NOT the result of artificial stereotyping by
society as the feminists (or women's libbers) would like us to believe. Of
course, perversion of the sex roles can be promoted, as indeed it is by the
feminist movement, but it cannot alter these basic facts of nature as stated
above. Some
people seem to regard marriage as some sort of business partnership, but it
is not. It is a relationship of love, and happiness is found in the
successful fulfilment of the different sex roles. The man is rightly the head
of both the woman and the family and should be their protector and provider.
The correct relationship and duties are clearly stated by the Apostle Paul when
he says: "Wives submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the
Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of
the Church...", and "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ
loved the church, and gave Himself for it." (Ephesians Chap.5 vv.
22-25). St. Peter, in his first Epistle (Chap.3), states similarly, and in
the marriage vows in the Book of Common Prayer both bride and bridegroom
promise to love each other, and the bride also
promises to "obey". The truly feminine woman expects and wants to
submit and obey in the context of love. She wants a masculine man to insist
on his natural dominant role just as much as he does. The masculine role
implies and requires not only assertiveness, but also responsibility and chivalry,
but no brutality. In their obsession for equality Women's Lib. do everything
possible to discredit and undermine these natural, good and proper sex
relationships and duties: but it is the aim of the CFW to stop them doing so. The
feminine woman wants to be wife to a dominant responsible man,
and to love and please him, and she wants to bear his children, and to rear
and educate them in the freedom of the modern home - where she can excel, and
also develop various other interests, of which there are many, both inside
and outside the home. Only a woman can do it, and it is a supreme achievement
of incalculable value to her husband, to herself, her children, and to
society. Observance of the correct sex roles as stated above leads to
happiness and fulfilment, and to the creation of the good home - which is the
most important unit in society. The opposite leads to unhappy or broken
homes, and to confused, deprived or badly brought up children, and sometimes
even to crime. FEMINISTS - OUT TO DESTROY THE HOUSEWIFE Although
there is no more valuable role in society than that of wife and mother in the
home, the Women's libbers (or feminists) of both sexes, from their positions
of power and influence in Parliament, in the so-called Equal Opportunities
Commission (which is 100% Women's Lib.), in the trade unions, in television,
radio and press, and in other places, do everything possible to discredit it
and to entice or force every married woman into employment outside the home.
This is, and has been, done by various legislative measures, by reducing the
husband's ability to support a wife and family (e.g. by reducing working
hours and thus his pay potential, and by taxation - such as by reducing or
abolishing the married man's tax allowances), by extensive and subtle
propaganda, and by providing nurseries where women can leave their children
for others to look after (the child's need for its mother's presence being
ignored, of course). They make the housewife feel inferior, although in fact
the opposite is true. That a
married woman, providing a family with a second income, may be doing a job
that could be filled by an unemployed married man, whose family has no earned
income, or by an unemployed single man or woman, is totally ignored by the
powers that be - such as Parliament and the EOC. Although the EOC boasts of
getting more married women into the "workforce", in its obsession
for "equality" and to break up the husband-supported wife and
family, the very reverse ought to be done - especially in a situation of high
unemployment. With ever
advancing technology the total number of hours required to be worked in a
country becomes less and less, and therefore any necessity for married women
to "work" should become almost nil. Legislation should support and
encourage the responsible masculine man and the dependent feminine woman. DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE AND ABILITIES In sport,
certainly in most ball games and athletics, women cannot give the same
performance as men. It is only because we DO operate sex
discrimination (separating the sexes for the benefit of the women) that women
can ever win. Sex discrimination is NOT the dirty word it is so
often made out to be. It simply recognises the sex differences. In some
activities, such as wrestling and body building, women make disgusting fools
of themselves, and it is a reflection of a sick society that people
(including governments) should encourage these man-aping women who pervert
womanhood - which should be symbolised by grace, beauty, gentleness and
femininity, not by masculine toughness, stamina, and brawn. In many
forms of work, men and women give different performances and show different aptitudes.
In the police force, for example, it is sheer nonsense to say (as the absurd
Sex Discrimination Act requires) that a policewoman can do the same as a man.
She cannot possibly cope with the male drunk or the violent male criminal,
nor do night foot-patrol duty, without relying on male police protection.
Similarly in a police cordon, she will always be a very weak link in the
chain. Our equality-obsessed M.P.s are, by their
laws, not only giving young women a totally wrong image of themselves but are
putting them at risk and wasting public money. Yet it is a sign of the
success of the unisex propaganda that most male police do not object to this
situation, nor to the women receiving equal pay for unequal work and
performance. The
Y-chromosome in the male cells induces greater variety and extremes, and it
is consequently the male who produces the highest achievements in art,
science, philosophy, and music, as well as more of the intellectually
sub-normal. Due also to the Y-chromosome, and their different physical and
psychological make-up, men are naturally the leaders and fighters. On the
other hand, women are normally more "average" than men. They are
better at the verbal skills (e.g. languages) and with their fingers, and,
above all, with all forms of nurturing - hence their excellence in dealing
with children and in nursing. Women also have a closer and very special
relationship with their own offspring, and their maternal instinct is strong. THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ACT & EOC Both would
be ludicrous (with their perversion of the English language in providing
"milkpersons", "chamberpersons",
"chairpersons", etc) if their real purpose were not so sinister.
They seek to destroy the natural sex roles, and they deny the Britisher the freedom of advertising for a
"milkman" or a "manageress" for example, or of taking sex
into consideration when filling a post however important this factor may be
to him, or relevant to the job. Worst of all, the purpose of the Act and the
EOC is to entice girls and women into every conceivable type of work, except
of course work of a feminine nature (e.g. general nursing) into which they
endeavour to entice boys and men. This harmful Act and the EOC should be
abolished. OCCUPATIONS WOMEN SHOULD NOT DO Because of
their physical, psychological and emotional make-up (see under "Facts about the sex differences") women should not take on, or try
to take on, weapon carrying, violent or power roles, nor roles where
strength, great stamina or danger are involved, nor other male orientated
work or roles. It is also fundamentally unnatural to put women
over men. All such things are incompatible with true femininity. The latest
Women's Lib. obscenity is the demand for "a woman's right to kill",
and in some countries they are letting women into combat roles in the armed
forces - although whether they dare use them seems unlikely. One wonders what
perversity makes some women want to do this, or even to be in the armed
services, and what perversity makes men encourage and allow it. The very nature of the armed services make them suitable only for
the masculine man. For men to
want to put women in positions of power etc (as mentioned in the above
paragraph), as many men do, clearly indicates emasculation (self induced or
otherwise) on a large scale, an astonishing refusal to accept facts, a
serious lack of knowledge about femininity and its great value, and an
illogical obsession for "equality" to the extent of trying to force
it into a context where it does not and cannot apply. It also shows lack of
real concern for women, since it is not in their interests as child-bearers,
and/or medically, physically, or psychologically. The
Women's Libbers or Feminists (the words mean the same thing) even cause
trouble in the Church: they have demanded the ordination of women deacons and
priestesses, and regardless of the effect and the many valid objections. The
example of Jesus Christ in choosing only men as apostles (He would have
included women had it been right), and the explicit instructions of St. Paul
and St. Peter that women should not usurp authority over men, nor
speak/preach in church, is ignored, as is 2000 years of Church doctrine and
tradition. Not content with this some also want to introduce the concept of
the female God: a wicked blasphemy, which perhaps reached its apogee in the "Christa"
(a woman on the Cross) displayed for a time in New York Cathedral. Boys and
girls should learn the value and validity of the different sex roles and
should be educated accordingly. Girls should be encouraged into feminine type
interests and jobs, not masculine ones, and their probable future vocation of
wife and mother should not be devalued or ignored as at present. The National
Union of Teachers, supported by the EOC, want all school text books altered
so as to remove all references to the natural sex roles,
and some even want to show the roles reversed. This, and other,
indoctrination of children with the unisex/feminist perversion must stop.
Career guide books for school leavers totally ignore the existence of two
sexes, and not a word is said about preparing for the important career of
wife and mother. The sexes
are physically and psychologically different, as are their priorities, aptitudes,
abilities and interests, and these sex differences should be encouraged and
enhanced, not suppressed. Unisex does not lead to happiness or
fulfilment, but to confusion, unnatural behaviour and often to psychiatric problems.
The increase in female violence in mixed schools, and outside, is a direct
result of the "equality" indoctrination and encouragement of girls
to act like boys. The converse is true of boys, who are for the same reasons unchivalrous, and often irresponsible or effeminate. The deliberate indoctrination of children and young people with
the totally unnatural doctrine of unisex/women's lib. is one of the greatest evils in society today. Education
should take full account of the sex differences. Boys and young men should,
among other things, be encouraged to be masculine, chivalrous, and protective
towards girls, and girls encouraged to respond and have confidence in their
weaker sex feminine role and to know the joy of being female and feminine. This accords with nature and what is right, and leads to
good and happy relationships, marriages, and families of the future. PROMISCUITY, ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY,
ETC. The
undermining of the natural sex roles, attitudes, and standards in society
also leads to promiscuity, abortion, transvestism (women dressing like men,
and vice versa), and homosexuality. With regard to abortion, it is an
appalling fact that in the As for
homosexuality, this is clearly unnatural, as well as being contrary to
scripture (Lev. 18:22, Rom. 1:27), yet many young people who could be
'cured', or who would not otherwise let inklings this way develop, are positively
encouraged in this wrong, instead of being advised and helped to normality,
as most could be. It is
unbelievably extensive, and much goes unrecognised as such. But it is a fact
that whatever newspaper or magazine one picks up there is almost certain to
be one or more articles about some Women's Lib. grievance, viewpoint or
demand. Reports about young women doing masculine activities are always
published and given prominence of place and praise. Research shows that for
every thirty articles promoting Women's Lib. in some way there will be, on
average, only one promoting the feminine role in any way. Most women's magazines
seem to give much of their space to the Women's Lib. perversion. In
television and radio, in educational talks, the child's sex is usually
ignored, and virtually never is the girl's natural vocation of wife and
mother mentioned. There are women's programmes, but these mostly put over the
Women's Lib. line, and some are clearly for no other purpose than to promote
some aspect of Women's Lib. 'doctrine' and for undermining femininity. The
inherent bias is such that the opposite viewpoint is very seldom allowed
expression. Most TV
plays and films show women in roles displaying manly courage, daring and
toughness, or in violent, gun-carrying, policing, domineering, aggressive,
assertive, or other masculine/non-feminine type roles, and/or having
authority over men or usurping their authority, or pushing some other Women's
Lib. aim. Seldom in a modern play or film is a woman shown as being truly
feminine or in a feminine role. Furthermore, directives have been issued that
in every type of programme, be it news, or about oil rigs or engineering,
every effort must be made to find a woman to appear and speak. Any idea that
any subject may be more appropriate for men to deal with must be destroyed.
Needless to say, most of the women who do so appear are of the Women's Lib.
variety - and some with noticeably manly characteristics. By and
large the Women's Libbers (or Feminists), of both the male and female sorts,
have now got control of the mass media - mankind's most powerful propaganda
weapon - and one wonders to what extent they will continue to pervert society
with their unnatural doctrine over the coming years. Is there hope for a
change? It is at least a sign of the validity and strength of the natural sex
differences and roles that, in spite of the mass media propaganda, there are
still some masculine men and feminine women about. Concerted effort is
urgently needed, however, if right is to prevail. Women's
Lib. tries to discredit the attractive pleasing woman or girl by calling her
a "sex-object", but to people endowed with normal sex feelings this
is seen as no insult. It is natural for both sexes to try to please and
attract the other, and with regard to feminine beauty, this is a quality of
universal value admired by all normal people throughout the ages. To possess
it is wonderful. The
Women's Libbers are obsessed with the erroneous notion that every human activity
must be done by both sexes and that their rights, duties, and requirements
are the same. They are determined to push women into positions of power and
into all male orientated positions. They want women to adopt the masculine
characteristics of aggressiveness and assertiveness. They have complete
contempt for femininity and feminine values, regardless of their intrinsic
goodness and value. They neuter words, demand maternity leave and beds for
men, they want to force men and women into mixed hospital wards (regardless
of the fact that this is repugnant to both men and women), they want law
enforced wages for wives, and an end to the family as we know it. Their
concept of marriage is grotesque, and they bring nothing but conflict and
bitterness between the sexes. They want to encourage the development of
effeminate men and masculine women in their obsession for equality and
unisex. They are incapable of understanding that men and women have different
priorities and interests. Unlike men, women do not have to make paid
employment the central issue in life. A woman's status does not depend on
profession or power. It is insulting to a woman to imply that she is nothing
unless she apes men. Men and women are equally important but different: a
fact of nature and of God's creation. VALUE OF THE SEXUAL POLARITIES, ETC. The
male-female polarities are an essential part of the individual's ego and the
basis of love, romance, and happiness - perhaps the most important things in
life. Masculine dominance and feminine submissiveness are natural and good,
and in the case of married couples, These good
and proper relationships also lead to the good and happy marriage, home and
family. The family is the most basic but most important unit in human
society, yet, as already indicated, its security and stability is threatened,
and sometimes to breaking point, as a result of the Women's Lib. / Feminist /
Unisex perversion. This threat must be extinguished. The CFW's case cannot be fully stated in this web site.
However, it is hoped that its contents will generally educate and inform, be
of interest and help to students and young people and guide them along the
right paths, and that it will give support and confidence to the feminine
woman or girl, of whatever age and occupation, who is so often under attack.
It is also hoped that it will give encouragement and confidence to the wife
and mother in the home (the Housewife), to the masculine man, and to the
family. It is hoped that it will give women confidence in being feminine, and
men confidence in being masculine. There is no doubt that the masculine man
and the feminine woman, each with their distinctive attitudes and roles so
invaluable to each other and to humanity, are the
proper norm for human society, not the man-aping woman and the weak or
effeminate man. History, the sciences (anatomy, physiology, psychology,
etc.), and the Christian religion (including the Bible and Book of Common
Prayer), are ALL at one on this. The CFW
seeks to mobilise public support and action for its objectives. It produces
various leaflets and publications, including its journal "Vive la
Difference", it provides speakers (for schools, universities, and other
organisations), and puts forward its case in the press and on radio and television,
and is often consulted by these and other bodies. As already stated, it also
offers a service of advice and help to the public on request. The CFW relies
entirely upon voluntary subscriptions, gifts and help, for carrying out its
urgent task, and it is hoped that you will assist or give
support in whatever way you can. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2007 CFW - Concern for Family and Womanhood |